• heartfairy:

    image

    (via dingdongyouarewrong)

  • chambergambit:

    chambergambit:

    snobby new yorker accidentally gets stranded back in time in the revolutionary war and they genuinely cannot handle the fact that everything important is happening in boston and philly

    like they understand it rationally but in their heart they’re like “lin manuel miranda lied to me.”

    (via smooth-mccrimmonal)

  • cringelizard:

    I honestly do not think “AI will never be as good as human creativity” is a good argument at this point. Like yes, it is true right now, but they’re just going to keep trying to prove it wrong. To me the line is, “Modern AI is built off of PLAGIARISM, UNPAID and UNDERPAID labor.” AI is a labor rights issue, not just for the people who’s labor it would replace, but for the people whose labor was STOLEN for the AI to “create” anything.

    (via in-sufficientdata)

  • thisnewjoe:

    lizardsfromspace:

    One of the interchangeable ghouls running in 2024 is talking up his plan to tie voting rights to passing a civics test & it’s amazing watching people discuss this in neutral terms

    A tweet from CBS News: Vivek Ramaswamy is proposing a constitutional amendment that requiring citizens 18 to 24 to pass a civics test in order to vote - the same one immigrants take to become naturalized U.S. citizens.ALT

    A lot of the response to this is “oh, that’s great, next let’s restore civics education in schools”, but the entire point is that they’re not going to improve civics education. The age range gives a hint: this is a ploy to disenfranchise young voters, by, presumably, demanding they pass a test the state won’t train them for in order to get rights granted by the states. It’s like saying “oh, yes, literacy tests for voting makes sense, it’ll really inspire the South to educate black people”. It uh. Didn’t. And I think many of the people agreeing know that and support it bc it’s disenfranchising, but some seem to just agree bc it’s “COMMON SENSE” and they’re not digging any deeper?

    This would be a civics test authored by a far right administration, to be clear. The tests we give immigrants are already propagandistic nonsense, imagine that in the hands of the “slavery taught people valuable skills” crowd

    Also, his amendment would allow young people who can’t pass the test to vote if they join the military. This is a “service guarantees citizenship” amendment

    He's proposing a constitutional amendment that would require citizens 18 to 24 to pass a civics test in order to vote — the same one immigrants take to become naturalized U.S. citizens. Under his proposal, young Americans could, as an alternative, perform six months of military or first-responder service. But if none of these requirements are met, they would have to wait until they turn 25 before they could vote in their first election.ALT

    Many young people don’t realize that the entire reason we don’t have civics, and why we have such a public degradation of critical thinking, come specifically from Republican efforts to sabotage education. Their goal in state legislatures for generations has been to destroy education to maintain control at any cost. Most states have grown out of that, but not all, and many states still have recovered important classes like civics, the arts, and other things that add value to life without also feeding into capitalist employment properties where they take science and math and wage compensation wars against everyone.

    It’s the conservatives that keep healthcare in the US tied to employment, and why we don’t have paid sick days for all the sick days someone might need. Conservative values are an illness that will bring the dark ages back if we don’t keep pressure on to unfuck our governance structures.

    (via in-sufficientdata)

  • tigbiddygandalf:

    image

    (via duel1971)

  • rosebloodcat:

    bogleech:

    kaible:

    bogleech:

    coolclaytony:

    bogleech:

    this 50′s hungarian comic strip I’d never heard of until now is so damn cute for something that also gets so horny

    It helps that the writer was trying to create something he hoped would appeal to women as much as men.

    Yeah and I think where it really succeeds vs. modern anime wifey fantasy shit is that Jucika really is just a character super comfortable with being sexual, likes looking sexy and even has no shame in using it to get her way:

    image
    image

    ….But at the same time, she doesn’t tolerate being objectified against her wishes:

    image
    image

    ….And the comic takes her side in both cases, whereas I’ve seen countless modern narratives in which this same character would have only been framed as like a Slutty ™ Bitch ™ or full blown villain.

    One of the things I also really like about this comic, besides what’s already been stated, is that the humor isn’t always about her being sexy. Sometimes it’s just about other goofy things in her life!

    image
    image
    image
    image

    oh yes many of them are experienes just anybody can relate to

    image

    but then there’s also the time she just….built a functional AI?

    image

    she just didn’t predict how the robot rebellion would really manifest

    I love how there isn’t a single dialogue bubble, yet you can fully understand what’s happening.

    Always reblog Jucika.

    (via carry-on-my-wayward-butt)

  • digableswaggot:
“digableswaggot:
“ SO SOMEHOW MY YAOI SHIRT ENDED UP IN MY DAD’S LAUNDRY BASKET HELP I CAN’T BREATHE
”
OMG GUYS PLEASE STOP REBLOGGING THIS MY DAD IS CALLING HIMSELF THE YAOI GOD
”

    digableswaggot:

    digableswaggot:

    SO SOMEHOW MY YAOI SHIRT ENDED UP IN MY DAD’S LAUNDRY BASKET HELP I CAN’T BREATHE

    OMG GUYS PLEASE STOP REBLOGGING THIS MY DAD IS CALLING HIMSELF THE YAOI GOD

    (via gig-kephart)

  • memewhore:

    image

    (via warrior-of-the-runes)

  • unclefather:

    image

    where is the glitch

    (via astrovagrant)

  • Install Theme